From Fred Randall

The fact that the Rose now seems to be on track financially is great news and I wish them every success.

But if it is to survive as an integral part of Kingston's cultural life, it must have a higher profile and this means putting on shows.

I know that it is still only a building site and there are serious problems (not least those concerned with health and safety) but it is, I feel, important that it does not spend most of its time shut up.

Incidentally, I'm sure that with a bit of effort the large amount of window space could be used to much greater effect what about dedicating it to the University Art Department? Shows that are put on there do not have to involve important London names. They could be local companies provided they were of a professional enough standard or they could be community theatre or even street theatre. The main point is that it should be seen to be functioning.

I seem to remember in 2003 we were told that the theatre would be open in 2005. Now we are told it will be September 2007. Anyone who knows anything about building works will tell you they are inevitably late in completion, unless a penalty clause is included in the contract.

And what about signage? How easy is it for strangers to find it?

FRED RANDALL Villiers Avenue Surbiton